Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38249853›Full record

ArticleLearning health systems2024

Learning from an equitable, data-informed response to COVID-19: Translating knowledge into future action and preparation.

Morgen Stanzler, Johanna Figueroa, Andrew F Beck, Marianne E McPherson, Steve Miff, Heidi Penix, Jessica Little, Bhargavi Sampath, Pierre Barker, David M Hartley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning health systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Ten Simple Rules for Making a Career Transition from Basic Science to Public Health Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Morgen StanzlerInstitute for Healthcare Improvement Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1832-6394
Johanna FigueroaInstitute for Healthcare Improvement Boston Massachusetts USA.
Andrew F BeckCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA.
Marianne E McPhersonInstitute for Healthcare Improvement Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7242-4468
Steve MiffParkland Center for Clinical Innovation (PCCI) Dallas Texas USA.
Heidi PenixCivitas Networks for Health Portland Maine USA.
Jessica LittleCivitas Networks for Health Portland Maine USA.
Bhargavi SampathInstitute for Healthcare Improvement Boston Massachusetts USA.
Pierre BarkerInstitute for Healthcare Improvement Boston Massachusetts USA.
David M HartleyCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati Ohio USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2589-2538
Institute for Healthcare Improvement · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USMaineHealth · USParkland Center For Clinical Innovation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic revealed numerous barriers to effectively managing public health crises, including difficulties in using publicly available, community-level data to create learning systems in support of local public health decision responses. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, a group of health care partners began meeting to learn from their collective experiences. We identified key tools and processes for using data and learning system structures to drive equitable public health decision making throughout different phases of the pandemic. Methods: In fall of 2021, the team developed an initial theory of change directed at achieving herd immunity for COVID-19. The theoretical drivers were explored qualitatively through a series of nine 45-min telephonic interviews conducted with 16 public health and community leaders across the United States. Interview responses were analyzed into key themes to inform potential future practices, tools, and systems. In addition to the interviews, partners in Dallas and Cincinnati reflected on their own COVID-19 experiences. Results: Interview responses fell broadly into four themes that contribute to effective, community driven responses to COVID-19: real-time, accessible data that are mindful of the tension between community transparency and individual privacy; a continued fostering of public trust; adaptable infrastructures and systems; and creating cohesive community coalitions with shared alignment and goals. These themes and partner experiences helped us revise our preliminary theory of change around the importance of community collaboration and trust building and also helped refine the development of the Community Protection Dashboard tool. Conclusions: There was broad agreement amongst public health and community leaders about the key elements of the data and learning systems required to manage public health responses to COVID-19. These findings may be informative for guiding the use of data and learning in the management of future public health crises or population health initiatives.

Indexed as

dataequitylearning systemstrust

Identifiers

PMID38249853
PMCPMC10797568
OpenAlexW4365516346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.