ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023
Sentiment interpretability analysis on Chinese texts employing multi-task and knowledge base.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of deep learning techniques, the applications have become increasingly widespread in various domains. However, traditional deep learning methods are often referred to as "black box" models with low interpretability of their results, posing challenges for their application in certain critical domains. In this study, we propose a comprehensive method for the interpretability analysis of sentiment models. The proposed method encompasses two main aspects: attention-based analysis and external knowledge integration. First, we train the model within sentiment classification and generation tasks to capture attention scores from multiple perspectives. This multi-angle approach reduces bias and provides a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying sentiment. Second, we incorporate an external knowledge base to improve evidence extraction. By leveraging character scores, we retrieve complete sentiment evidence phrases, addressing the challenge of incomplete evidence extraction in Chinese texts. Experimental results on a sentiment interpretability evaluation dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. We observe a notable increase in accuracy by 1.3%, Macro-F1 by 13%, and MAP by 23%. Overall, our approach offers a robust solution for enhancing the interpretability of sentiment models by combining attention-based analysis and the integration of external knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.