Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38249583›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

An end-to-end LSTM-Attention based framework for quasi-steady-state CEST prediction.

Wei Yang, Jisheng Zou, Xuan Zhang, Yaowen Chen, Hanjing Tang, Gang Xiao, Xiaolei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei Yang *Great Bay University, Dongguan, China.
Jisheng Zou *College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Xuan Zhang *College of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Yaowen ChenCollege of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Hanjing TangCollege of Engineering, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Gang XiaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Hanshan Normal University, Chaozhou, China.
Xiaolei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often takes prolonged saturation duration (Ts) and relaxation delay (Td) to reach the steady state, and yet the insufficiently long Ts and Td in actual experiments may underestimate the CEST measurement. In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning-based model for quasi-steady-state (QUASS) prediction from non-steady-state CEST acquired in experiments, therefore overcoming the limitation of the CEST effect which needs prolonged saturation time to reach a steady state. To support network training, a multi-pool Bloch-McConnell equation was designed to derive wide-ranging simulated Z-spectra, so as to solve the problem of time and labor consumption in manual annotation work. Following this, we formulated a hybrid architecture of long short-term memory (LSTM)-Attention to improve the predictive ability. The multilayer perceptron, recurrent neural network, LSTM, gated recurrent unit, BiLSTM, and LSTM-Attention were included in comparative experiments of QUASS CEST prediction, and the best performance was obtained by the proposed LSTM-Attention model. In terms of the linear regression analysis, structural similarity index (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and mean-square error (MSE), the results of LSTM-Attention demonstrate that the coefficient of determination in the linear regression analysis was at least

Indexed as

Bloch-McConnell equationCEST-MRIdeep learningLSTM-AttentionQUASS CEST

Identifiers

PMID38249583
PMCPMC10797904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.