ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Clinical and diagnostic imaging profile of three anterior segment dysgenesis disorders presenting with infantile corneal opacities.
Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe three anterior segment dysgenesis disorders with infantile corneal opacities, namely, congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED), primary congenital glaucoma (PCG), and Peters anomaly (PA) in terms of clinical characteristics, histopathology, genetic association, and diagnostic imaging profiles using imaging modalities such as ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and microscope-integrated intraoperative optical coherence tomography (i-OCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsSeventy-four eyes with 22 eyes of CHED, 28 eyes of PA, and 24 eyes of PCG were clinically evaluated and underwent imaging using UBM and i-OCT. Corneal buttons of 16 operated patients underwent histopathological analysis, while genetic analysis was done in 23 patients using whole-exome sequencing.
resultsCorneal diameters (CD) and UBM parameters like anterior chamber depth (ACD), iris thickness (IT), and ciliary body (CB) thickness revealed a statistically significant difference between the three categories. In PA, 9 eyes had a third rare phenotype with only a posterior corneal defect with no iris adhesions. Genetic mutations were seen in all tested patients with CHED, in 83.3% of patients with PCG, and in 80% of patients with the third type of PA. i-OCT helped in the characterization of corneal opacity, identification of posterior corneal defects, iridocorneal adhesions, and contour of Descemet's membrane.
conclusionOverlapping phenotypes of the above disorders cause a diagnostic dilemma and parameters like CDs, UBM ACD, IT, and CB thickness help differentiate between them. i-OCT can help in classifying the diseases in a high resolution, non-contact manner, and can better delineate corneal characteristics. The rare third type of PA phenotype may have a genetic association.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.