Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38249503›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Updates on congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy.

Neet Mehta, Anshuman Verma, Divya Sree Achanta, Chitra Kannabiran, Sanhita Roy, Dilip Kumar Mishra, Sunita Chaurasia, Deepak Paul Edward, Muralidhar Ramappa

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biomolecules · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neet MehtaAcademy of Eye Care Education, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Anshuman VermaCentre for Rare Eye Diseases and Ophthalmic Genetics, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Divya Sree AchantaCentre for Rare Eye Diseases and Ophthalmic Genetics, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Chitra KannabiranProf. Brien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sanhita RoyProf. Brien Holden Eye Research Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Dilip Kumar MishraOphthalmic Pathology Services, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sunita ChaurasiaThe Cornea Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Deepak Paul EdwardDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Pathology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Muralidhar RamappaCentre for Rare Eye Diseases and Ophthalmic Genetics, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INIllinois College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy (CHED) is a rare genetic corneal disorder causing progressive cornea clouding and significant visual impairment. CHED remains a leading indication for pediatric corneal transplantation despite its infrequency, particularly in regions with high consanguinity rates like Southeast Asia. Identifying the Solute Carrier Family 4 Member 11 (SLC4A11) gene as the genetic basis of CHED has led to the discovery of it's various genetic variations. However, a comprehensive understanding of its clinical-genetic correlation, pathophysiology, and optimal management is ongoing. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge about CHED, covering its genetic origins, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical presentation, and management strategies. Surgical intervention, such as penetrating keratoplasty (PK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), remains the primary treatment. DSAEK and DMEK offer advantages over PK, including quicker visual recovery, reduced complications, and longer graft survival, especially in the pediatric age group. The timing of surgical interventions depends on disease severity, age at presentation, comorbidities, and visual potential. Elevated oxidative stress in CHED corneal tissue suggests potential benefits from anti-inflammatory drugs to rescue mutated endothelial cells. Considering the limitations of corneal graft surgeries, exploring novel gene-based molecular therapies are essential for future management. Early diagnosis, appropriate surgical interventions, amblyopia control, and genetic counseling for predictive analysis are pivotal for optimizing CHED management. A multidisciplinary approach involving ophthalmologists, researchers, and genetic counselors is essential for precise diagnosis and optimal care for CHED patients.

Indexed as

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophycorneal endothelial dystrophies in childhoodSolute Carrier Family 4 Member 11 (SLC4A11)

Identifiers

PMID38249503
PMCPMC10798399
OpenAlexW4389097799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.