Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38249366›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Fatal crashes and rare events logistic regression: an exploratory empirical study.

Yuxie Xiao, Lulu Lin, Hanchu Zhou, Qian Tan, Junjie Wang, Yi Yang, Zhongzhi Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuxie XiaoSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lulu LinSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hanchu ZhouSchool of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qian TanEngineering Consulting Department, Changsha Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Changsha, China.
Junjie WangInstitute of Transportation System Science and Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Yi YangSchool of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China.
Zhongzhi XuSchool of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Fatal road accidents are statistically rare, posing challenges for accurate estimation through the classic logit model (LM). This study seeks to validate the efficacy of a rare events logistic model (RELM) in enhancing the precision of fatal crash estimations. Methods: Both LM and RELM were employed to examine the relationship between pertinent risk factors and the incidence of fatal crashes. Crash-injury datasets sourced from Hillsborough County, Florida served as the empirical basis for evaluating the performance metrics of both LM and RELM. Results: The analysis revealed that RELM yielded more accurate predictions of fatal crashes compared to LM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each model was computed to offer a comparative performance assessment. The empirical evidence notably favored RELM over LM as substantiated by superior AUC values. Conclusion: The study offers empirical validation that RELM is demonstrably more proficient in predicting fatal crashes than the LM, thereby recommending its application for nuanced traffic safety analytics.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficFloridaLogistic ModelsRisk FactorsROC Curvebinary classificationfatal crasheslogit modelrare eventstraffic safety

Identifiers

PMID38249366
PMCPMC10796722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.