Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38249326›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

Diagnostic value of [

István Farkas, Gábor Sipka, Annamária Bakos, Anikó Maráz, Zoltán Bajory, Zsófia Mikó, Tamás Czékus, Szabolcs Urbán, Linda Varga, László Pávics and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Detection rate of [Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic efficacy of [BMC cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Head-to-head comparison ofEJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic performance ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2025
    Article
  8. Pathological and radiological features of false-positive lesions on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Different PSMA Radiopharmaceuticals: A Comparative Study of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

István FarkasDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Gábor SipkaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Annamária BakosDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Anikó MarázDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zoltán BajoryDepartment of Urology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsófia MikóDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Tamás CzékusDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Szabolcs UrbánDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Linda VargaDepartment of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
László PávicsDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zsuzsanna BesenyiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Szeged, Korányi Fasor 6, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-9620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A large number of studies have proved that prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) provides excellent accuracy in primary staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Less data exist with PSMA-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT investigations. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of [ Design and methods: We retrospectively analysed PSMA-SPECT/CT scans of 20 healthy volunteers and 100 male patients with prostate cancer. All of them had histologically confirmed prostate cancer. In all, 28 patients were examined for primary staging and 72 for biochemical recurrence or progressive disease. Whole body SPECT/CT imaging was carried out 6 h after the intravenous administration of 666 ± 102 MBq [ Results: Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for primary prostate cancer were 86%, 100%, 100%, 83% and 92%, respectively. For detecting metastases in primary staging, these values were 88%, 100%, 100%, 85% and 93%, respectively. The radiopharmaceutical uptake of primary prostate cancer was significantly higher than in normal prostate. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the method in the visualization of local recurrence were 67%, 100%, 100%, 86% and 89%, and for detecting metastases in restaging were 91%, 92%, 98%, 75% and 91%, respectively. In restaging, detection rates were 37% under prostate-specific antigen level of 1 ng/mL, 74% between 1 and 5 ng/mL and 80% >5 ng/mL. Conclusion: [

Indexed as

I&Sprostate cancerPSMAscintigraphySPECT/CTTc-99m-Mas3-y-nal-k(Sub-KuE)

Identifiers

PMID38249326
PMCPMC10798073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.