ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024
Diagnostic value of [
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Detection rate of [Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic efficacy of [BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of the biodistribution of [EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Head-to-head comparison ofEJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Can Tc-99m-PSMA SPECT/CT Be Used as Accessible Alternative for Diagnosis of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer? A Prospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cystoscopic ICG-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Study.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Pathological and radiological features of false-positive lesions on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Single-Photon Emission Computer Tomography Imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Expression in Prostate Cancer Patients Using a Novel Peptide-Based Probe [ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- PSMA-based theranostics in diagnosing and treating prostate cancer in the Asian male population: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- [Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Different PSMA Radiopharmaceuticals: A Comparative Study of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A large number of studies have proved that prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) provides excellent accuracy in primary staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Less data exist with PSMA-single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT investigations. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of [ Design and methods: We retrospectively analysed PSMA-SPECT/CT scans of 20 healthy volunteers and 100 male patients with prostate cancer. All of them had histologically confirmed prostate cancer. In all, 28 patients were examined for primary staging and 72 for biochemical recurrence or progressive disease. Whole body SPECT/CT imaging was carried out 6 h after the intravenous administration of 666 ± 102 MBq [ Results: Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for primary prostate cancer were 86%, 100%, 100%, 83% and 92%, respectively. For detecting metastases in primary staging, these values were 88%, 100%, 100%, 85% and 93%, respectively. The radiopharmaceutical uptake of primary prostate cancer was significantly higher than in normal prostate. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of the method in the visualization of local recurrence were 67%, 100%, 100%, 86% and 89%, and for detecting metastases in restaging were 91%, 92%, 98%, 75% and 91%, respectively. In restaging, detection rates were 37% under prostate-specific antigen level of 1 ng/mL, 74% between 1 and 5 ng/mL and 80% >5 ng/mL. Conclusion: [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.