ArticleCureus2023
The Clinical Performance of Cell Population Data for Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infection in Cancer Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Bloodstream infection (BSI) induces a change in the number and morphology of blood cells. In this study, we compared cell population data (CPD) parameters between cancer patients with or without BSI to determine whether these parameters could serve as biomarkers of BSI. Methods Between April and June 2021, 43 BSI-negative and 22 BSI-positive cancer patients were enrolled in this study. We compared 18 CPD parameters and biomarkers between cancer patients with BSI-positive and BSI-negative. Results There were significant differences in the levels of several CPD parameters, including MO-WZ (p=0.040), MO-X (p<0.01), MO-Y (p=0.012), NE-SFL (p<0.01), and NE-WX (p=0.037), but not C-reactive protein (p=0.347) and procalcitonin (p=0.237) between BSI-positive and BSI-negative patients. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were above 0.7 for MO-X (0.762; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.624-0.901), NE-SFL (0.766; 95% CI: 0.625-0.880). And LY-WY (p=0.024) showed a significant difference between gram-negative and gram-positive BSI patients with high AUC (0.883; 95% CI: 0.703-1). Conclusion CPD parameters (MO-X and NE-SFL) provide additional information for discriminating between BSI-negative and BSI-positive BSI. And LY-WY provides useful information for discriminating between cancer patients with gram-negative BSI and gram-positive BSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.