ReviewJournal of Intelligence2024
How Can We Best Assess Spatial Skills? Practical and Conceptual Challenges.
Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Detecting Demographic Influences on Measures of Spatial Ability with Rasch Tree Analysis.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Game-Based Assessment of Spatial Cognition Across a Wide Age Range.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Disciplinary trends in spatial concept associations: a multifaceted analysis of student responses.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Development of a spatial skills test for 4th grade primary school students: validity and reliability study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- "Freely explore this environment": individual differences in exploration behavior and survey knowledge.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- Validation of International Cognitive Ability Resource (ICAR) Implemented in Mobile Toolbox (MTB).Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- The Rapid Sense of Direction (R-SOD) Scale: A Brief Self-Report Tool to Identify Developmental Topographical Disorientation (DTD).Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluating convergence between two data visualization literacy assessments.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- Spatial Reasoning and Its Contribution to Mathematical Performance Across Different Content Domains: Evidence from Chinese Students.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Mental Rotation Performance: Contribution of Item Features to Difficulties and Functional Adaptation.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Visuospatial working memory and (free and cued) recall of survey knowledge after environment navigation.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Subjective spatial orientation discomfort is associated with decreased real-world spatial performance and lower cognitive function.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
- Consistency of spatial ability performance in children, adolescents, and young adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- A 6-week coordinative motor training program improves spatial ability performances in healthy children.Frontiers in cognition · 2024Article
- The effect of internal and external visualization of rotation on postural stability.Frontiers in cognition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial thinking skills are associated with performance, persistence, and achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) school subjects. Because STEM knowledge and skills are integral to developing a well-trained workforce within and beyond STEM, spatial skills have become a major focus of cognitive, developmental, and educational research. However, these efforts are greatly hampered by the current lack of access to reliable, valid, and well-normed spatial tests. Although there are hundreds of spatial tests, they are often hard to access and use, and information about their psychometric properties is frequently lacking. Additional problems include (1) substantial disagreement about what different spatial tests measure-even two tests with similar names may measure very different constructs; (2) the inability to measure some STEM-relevant spatial skills by any existing tests; and (3) many tests only being available for specific age groups. The first part of this report delineates these problems, as documented in a series of structured and open-ended interviews and surveys with colleagues. The second part outlines a roadmap for addressing the problems. We present possibilities for developing shared testing systems that would allow researchers to test many participants through the internet. We discuss technological innovations, such as virtual reality, which could facilitate the testing of navigation and other spatial skills. Developing a bank of testing resources will empower researchers and educators to explore and support spatial thinking in their disciplines, as well as drive the development of a comprehensive and coherent theoretical understanding of spatial thinking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.