ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Using the Grey Wolf Aquila Synergistic Algorithm for Design Problems in Structural Engineering.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aquila Optimization-Assisted Artificial Neural Network for Classification Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Multi-Strategy Adaptive Coati Optimization Algorithm for Constrained Optimization Engineering Design Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-Strategy Improved Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Dynamic Random Walk and Dynamic Opposition Learning for Improving Aquila Optimizer: Solving Constrained Engineering Design Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Aquila Optimizer (AO) is a metaheuristic algorithm that is inspired by the hunting behavior of the Aquila bird. The AO approach has been proven to perform effectively on a range of benchmark optimization issues. However, the AO algorithm may suffer from limited exploration ability in specific situations. To increase the exploration ability of the AO algorithm, this work offers a hybrid approach that employs the alpha position of the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) to drive the search process of the AO algorithm. At the same time, we applied the quasi-opposition-based learning (QOBL) strategy in each phase of the Aquila Optimizer algorithm. This strategy develops quasi-oppositional solutions to current solutions. The quasi-oppositional solutions are then utilized to direct the search phase of the AO algorithm. The GWO method is also notable for its resistance to noise. This means that it can perform effectively even when the objective function is noisy. The AO algorithm, on the other hand, may be sensitive to noise. By integrating the GWO approach into the AO algorithm, we can strengthen its robustness to noise, and hence, improve its performance in real-world issues. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the technique, the algorithm was benchmarked on 23 well-known test functions and CEC2017 test functions and compared with other popular metaheuristic algorithms. The findings demonstrate that our proposed method has excellent efficacy. Finally, it was applied to five practical engineering issues, and the results showed that the technique is suitable for tough problems with uncertain search spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.