Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38248560›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Environmental Preferences and Concerns of Recreational Trail Runners.

Leah Rosenkrantz, Nadine Schuurman, Scott A Lear

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Runnability: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Leah RosenkrantzFaculty of Environment, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-3480
Nadine SchuurmanFaculty of Environment, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1362-224X
Scott A LearFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Simon Fraser University · CA

Funding

Social Science and Humanities Research Council Insight Grant 435 2018 0114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trail running is a fast-growing sport, linked to improvements in both physical and psychological well-being. Despite its popularity, the preferences of trail runners are not well known. The objective of this study was to examine the environmental preferences and concerns of trail runners with respect to age and gender. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of recreational trail runners. A total of 548 people responded, of which 50.1% of respondents were women and 44.2% were men. The sample was distributed relatively evenly across age groups, up to 54 years; respondents over 55 represented only 9.4% of the sample. Comparisons of runner characteristics by gender indicated significant differences (

Indexed as

Physical ExaminationRunningCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleonline surveyoutdoor environmentsrunnability

Identifiers

PMID38248560
PMCPMC10815876
OpenAlexW4390933264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.