Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38248553›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

How Is Telehealth Currently Being Utilized to Help in Hypertension Management within Primary Healthcare Settings? A Scoping Review.

Haerawati Idris, Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni, Tety Rachmawati, Asep Kusnali, Anni Yulianti, Yuni Purwatiningsih, Syarifah Nuraini, Novia Susianti, Debri Rizki Faisal, Hidayat Arifin and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Lived experience of people with hypertension in Ethiopia: A phenomenological study, 2025.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haerawati IdrisDepartment of Health Administration & Policy, Faculty of Public Health, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya 30662, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-3483-6717
Wahyu Pudji NugraheniResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.
Tety RachmawatiResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.
Asep KusnaliResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5492-4116
Anni YuliantiResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.
Yuni PurwatiningsihResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1758-8803
Syarifah NurainiResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-9584-6380
Novia SusiantiResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-1635
Debri Rizki FaisalResearch Center for Public Health and Nutrition, National Research and Innovation Agency, Central Jakarta 10340, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2841-5123
Hidayat ArifinDepartment of Basic Nursing Care, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60286, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5647-5721
Asri MaharaniDivision of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth has improved patient access to healthcare services and has been shown to have a positive impact in various healthcare settings. In any case, little is understood regarding the utilization of telehealth in hypertension management in primary healthcare (PHC) settings. This study aimed to identify and classify information about the types of interventions and types of telehealth technology in hypertension management in primary healthcare. A scoping review based on PRISMA-ScR was used in this study. We searched for articles in four databases: Pubmed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Embase in English. The selected articles were published in 2013-2023. The data were extracted, categorized, and analyzed using thematic analysis. There were 1142 articles identified and 42 articles included in this study. Regarding the proportions of studies showing varying trends in the last ten years, most studies came from the United States (US) (23.8%), were conducted in urban locations (33.3%), and had a quantitative study approach (69%). Telehealth interventions in hypertension management are dominated by telemonitoring followed by teleconsultation. Asynchronous telehealth is becoming the most widely used technology in managing hypertension in primary care settings. Telehealth in primary care hypertension management involves the use of telecommunications technology to monitor and manage blood pressure and provide medical advice and counselling remotely.

Indexed as

HypertensionRemote ConsultationTelemedicineBlood PressureHumansPrimary Health Carehypertensionprimary healthcaretelehealthtelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID38248553
PMCPMC10815916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.