ArticleBrain sciences2024
On the Cut-Off Value of the Anteroposterior Diameter of the Midbrain Atrophy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 Patients.
Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving the Identification of the Preclinical Stages of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA) is a term that refers to a group of hereditary ataxias, which are neurological diseases characterized by degeneration of the cells that constitute the cerebellum. Studies suggest that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) supports diagnoses of ataxias, and linear measurements of the aneteroposterior diameter of the midbrain (ADM) have been investigated using MRI. These measurements correspond to studies in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) patients and in healthy subjects. Our goal was to obtain the cut-off value for ADM atrophy in SCA2 patients. (2) Methods: This study evaluated 99 participants (66 SCA2 patients and 33 healthy controls). The sample was divided into estimations (80%) and validation (20%) samples. Using the estimation sample, we fitted a logistic model using the ADM and obtained the cut-off value through the inverse of regression. (3) Results: The optimal cut-off value of ADM was found to be 18.21 mm. The area under the curve (AUC) of the atrophy risk score was 0.957 (95% CI: 0.895-0.991). Using this cut-off on the validation sample, we found a sensitivity of 100.00% (95% CI: 76.84%-100.00%) and a specificity of 85.71% (95% CI: 42.13%-99.64%). (4) Conclusions: We obtained a cut-off value that has an excellent discriminatory capacity to identify SCA2 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.