Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38248253›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2023

Event-Related Brain Potentials N140 and P300 during Somatosensory Go/NoGo Tasks Are Modulated by Movement Preparation.

Yuya Matsuda, Yasushi Sugawara, Mayu Akaiwa, Hidekazu Saito, Eriko Shibata, Takeshi Sasaki, Kazuhiro Sugawara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuya MatsudaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Yasushi SugawaraGraduate School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Mayu AkaiwaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hidekazu SaitoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Eriko ShibataMajor of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Healthcare and Science, Hokkaido Bunkyo University, Eniwa 061-1449, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takeshi SasakiDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kazuhiro SugawaraDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health Science, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0803-9922

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 22K11394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Go/NoGo task requires attention and sensory processing to distinguish a motor action cue or 'Go stimulus' from a 'NoGo stimulus' requiring no action, as well as motor preparation for a rapid Go stimulus response. The neural activity mediating these response phases can be examined non-invasively by measuring specific event-related brain potentials (ERPs) using electroencephalography. However, it is critical to determine how different task conditions, such as the relationship between attention site and movement site, influence ERPs and task performance. In this study, we compared attention-associated ERP components N140 and P300, the performance metrics reaction time (RT) and accuracy (%Error) and movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) between Go/NoGo task trials in which attention target and movement site were the same (right index finger movement in response to right index finger stimulation) or different (right index finger movement in response to fifth finger stimulation). In other Count trials, participants kept a running count of target stimuli presented but did not initiate a motor response. The N140 amplitudes at electrode site Cz were significantly larger in Movement trials than in Count trials regardless of the stimulation site-movement site condition. In contrast, the P300 amplitude at Cz was significantly smaller in Movement trials than in Count trials. The temporal windows of N140 and P300 overlapped with the MRCP. This superposition may influence N140 and P300 through summation, possibly independent of changes in attentional allocation.

Indexed as

Go/NoGo taskmovement-related cortical potentialsN140P300somatosensory evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID38248253
PMCPMC10813311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.