Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38248176›Full record

ReviewEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Selective Review on Information Criteria in Multiple Change Point Detection.

Zhanzhongyu Gao, Xun Xiao, Yi-Ping Fang, Jing Rao, Huadong Mo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhanzhongyu GaoSchool of Systems and Computing, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-5330-723X
Xun XiaoDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8780-5471
Yi-Ping FangChair Risk and Resilience of Complex Systems, Laboratoire Génie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Bures-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-3539
Jing RaoKey Laboratory of Precision Opto-Mechatronics Technology, School of Instrumentation and Opto-Electronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3105-7259
Huadong MoSchool of Systems and Computing, University of New South Wales, Canberra, ACT 2612, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7782-2884

Funding

France 2030 program ANR-11-IDEX-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Change points indicate significant shifts in the statistical properties in data streams at some time points. Detecting change points efficiently and effectively are essential for us to understand the underlying data-generating mechanism in modern data streams with versatile parameter-varying patterns. However, it becomes a highly challenging problem to locate multiple change points in the noisy data. Although the Bayesian information criterion has been proven to be an effective way of selecting multiple change points in an asymptotical sense, its finite sample performance could be deficient. In this article, we have reviewed a list of information criterion-based methods for multiple change point detection, including Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, minimum description length, and their variants, with the emphasis on their practical applications. Simulation studies are conducted to investigate the actual performance of different information criteria in detecting multiple change points with possible model mis-specification for the practitioners. A case study on the SCADA signals of wind turbines is conducted to demonstrate the actual change point detection power of different information criteria. Finally, some key challenges in the development and application of multiple change point detection are presented for future research work.

Indexed as

Akaike information criterionBayesian information criterionhypothesis testmodel selectionpiecewise constantsignal processing

Identifiers

PMID38248176
PMCPMC10813938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.