Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38248145›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Relationship between Information Scrambling and Quantum Darwinism.

Feng Tian, Jian Zou, Hai Li, Liping Han, Bin Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng TianSchool of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Jian ZouSchool of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-8688
Hai LiSchool of Information and Electronic Engineering, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6577-2050
Liping HanSchool of Science, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China.
Bin ShaoSchool of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11775019National Natural Science Foundation of China 11875086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A quantum system interacting with a multipartite environment can induce redundant encoding of the information of a system into the environment, which is the essence of quantum Darwinism. At the same time, the environment may scramble the initially localized information about the system. Based on a collision model, we mainly investigate the relationship between information scrambling in an environment and the emergence of quantum Darwinism. Our results show that when the mutual information between the system and environmental fragment is a linear increasing function of the fragment size, the tripartite mutual information (TMI) is zero, which can be proved generally beyond the collision model; when the system exhibits Darwinistic behavior, the TMI is positive (i.e., scrambling does not occur); when we see the behavior of an "encoding" environment, the TMI is negative (i.e., scrambling occurs). Additionally, we give a physical explanation for the above results by considering two simple but illustrative examples. Moreover, depending on the nature of system and environment interactions, it is also shown that the single qubit and two-qubit systems behave differently for the emergence of quantum Darwinism, and hence the scrambling, while their relationship is consistent with the above conclusion.

Indexed as

collision modelinformation scramblingquantum Darwinismquantum mutual informationtripartite mutual information

Identifiers

PMID38248145
PMCPMC10814458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.