Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38248096›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2023

Mechanisms and Potential Clinical Implications of Oral Microbiome in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Jingyi Wang, Bo Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The role ofFrontiers in oral health · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. New advances in oral microbiology and tumor research.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Potential Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activity ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingyi WangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Bo GaoState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

Chengdu Key Application Projects of Science and Technology 2021-YF09-00078-SNSichuan Science and Technology Program 2023NSFSC0575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms in the oral cavity are abundant in the human body. At present, more than 700 species of oral microorganisms have been identified. Recently, a lot of literature has indicated that the oral microbiota plays an important role in the occurrence, development, and prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) through various mechanisms. And researchers are now trying to utilize oral microbiota in cancer diagnosis and treatment. However, few articles systematically summarize the effects of oral microbes in the diagnosis, treatment, and disease outcomes of oral cancer. Herein, we made a summary of the microbial changes at cancerous sites and placed more emphasis on the mechanisms by which the oral microbiome promotes cancerization. Moreover, we aimed to find out the clinical value of the oral microbiome in OSCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMicrobiotaMouth NeoplasmsHumansSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neckimmunityinflammationoral microbiomeoral potentially malignant disordersoral squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38248096
PMCPMC10814288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.