ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Research on Multimodal Fusion of Temporal Electronic Medical Records.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-driven preoperative CT 3D planning: a narrative review on improving the accuracy of acetabular cup angle and size in total hip arthroplasty.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Deep Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Longitudinal Multimodal Clinical Data.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The surge in deep learning-driven EMR research has centered on harnessing diverse data forms. Yet, the amalgamation of diverse modalities within time series data remains an underexplored realm. This study probes a multimodal fusion approach, merging temporal and non-temporal clinical notes along with tabular data. We leveraged data from 1271 myocardial infarction and 6450 stroke inpatients at a Beijing tertiary hospital. Our dataset encompassed static, and time series note data, coupled with static and time series table data. The temporal data underwent a preprocessing phase, padding to a 30-day interval, and segmenting into 3-day sub-sequences. These were fed into a long short-term memory (LSTM) network for sub-sequence representation. Multimodal attention gates were implemented for both static and temporal subsequence representations, culminating in fused representations. An attention-backtracking module was introduced for the latter, adept at capturing enduring dependencies in temporal fused representations. The concatenated results were channeled into an LSTM to yield the ultimate fused representation. Initially, two note modalities were designated as primary modes, and subsequently, the proposed fusion model was compared with comparative models including recent models such as Crossformer. The proposed model consistently exhibited superior predictive prowess in both tasks. Removing the attention-backtracking module led to performance decline. The proposed model consistently shows excellent predictive capabilities in both tasks. The proposed method not only effectively integrates data from the four modalities, but also has a good understanding of how to handle irregular time series data and lengthy clinical texts. An effective method is provided, which is expected to be more widely used in multimodal medical data representation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.