Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38247928›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Machine Learning Force Field for Bio-Macromolecular Modeling Based on Quantum Chemistry-Calculated Interaction Energy Datasets.

Zhen-Xuan Fan, Sheng D Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhen-Xuan FanInstitute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.
Sheng D ChaoInstitute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5896-6700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate energy data from noncovalent interactions are essential for constructing force fields for molecular dynamics simulations of bio-macromolecular systems. There are two important practical issues in the construction of a reliable force field with the hope of balancing the desired chemical accuracy and working efficiency. One is to determine a suitable quantum chemistry level of theory for calculating interaction energies. The other is to use a suitable continuous energy function to model the quantum chemical energy data. For the first issue, we have recently calculated the intermolecular interaction energies using the SAPT0 level of theory, and we have systematically organized these energies into the ab initio SOFG-31 (homodimer) and SOFG-31-heterodimer datasets. In this work, we re-calculate these interaction energies by using the more advanced SAPT2 level of theory with a wider series of basis sets. Our purpose is to determine the SAPT level of theory proper for interaction energies with respect to the CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark chemical accuracy. Next, to utilize these energy datasets, we employ one of the well-developed machine learning techniques, called the CLIFF scheme, to construct a general-purpose force field for biomolecular dynamics simulations. Here we use the SOFG-31 dataset and the SOFG-31-heterodimer dataset as the training and test sets, respectively. Our results demonstrate that using the CLIFF scheme can reproduce a diverse range of dimeric interaction energy patterns with only a small training set. The overall errors for each SAPT energy component, as well as the SAPT total energy, are all well below the desired chemical accuracy of ~1 kcal/mol.

Indexed as

ab initio energy datasetsartificial intelligencemachine learning force fieldsnoncovalent interactionssymmetry-adapted perturbation theory

Identifiers

PMID38247928
PMCPMC11154266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.