Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38247906›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Leveraging Interpretable Feature Representations for Advanced Differential Diagnosis in Computational Medicine.

Genghong Zhao, Wen Cheng, Wei Cai, Xia Zhang, Jiren Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Genghong ZhaoSchool of Computer Science, Engineering Northeastern University, No.195 Chuangxin Road Hunnan District, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7020-862X
Wen ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
Wei CaiNeusoft Research of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co., Ltd., No.175-2 Chuangxin Road Hunnan District, Shenyang 110167, China.
Xia ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Engineering Northeastern University, No.195 Chuangxin Road Hunnan District, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2199-1088
Jiren LiuSchool of Computer Science, Engineering Northeastern University, No.195 Chuangxin Road Hunnan District, Shenyang 110169, China.ORCID 0009-0004-4006-2000
Neusoft (China) · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2020AAA0109400Shenyang Science and Technology Plan Fund No. 21-102-0-09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic errors represent a critical issue in clinical diagnosis and treatment. In China, the rate of misdiagnosis in clinical diagnostics is approximately 27.8%. By comparison, in the United States, which boasts the most developed medical resources globally, the average rate of misdiagnosis is estimated to be 11.1%. It is estimated that annually, approximately 795,000 Americans die or suffer permanent disabilities due to diagnostic errors, a significant portion of which can be attributed to physicians' failure to make accurate clinical diagnoses based on patients' clinical presentations. Differential diagnosis, as an indispensable step in the clinical diagnostic process, plays a crucial role. Accurately excluding differential diagnoses that are similar to the patient's clinical manifestations is key to ensuring correct diagnosis and treatment. Most current research focuses on assigning accurate diagnoses for specific diseases, but studies providing reasonable differential diagnostic assistance to physicians are scarce. This study introduces a novel solution specifically designed for this scenario, employing machine learning techniques distinct from conventional approaches. We develop a differential diagnosis recommendation computation method for clinical evidence-based medicine, based on interpretable representations and a visualized computational workflow. This method allows for the utilization of historical data in modeling and recommends differential diagnoses to be considered alongside the primary diagnosis for clinicians. This is achieved by inputting the patient's clinical manifestations and presenting the analysis results through an intuitive visualization. It can assist less experienced doctors and those in areas with limited medical resources during the clinical diagnostic process. Researchers discuss the effective experimental results obtained from a subset of general medical records collected at Shengjing Hospital under the premise of ensuring data quality, security, and privacy. This discussion highlights the importance of addressing these issues for successful implementation of data-driven differential diagnosis recommendations in clinical practice. This study is of significant value to researchers and practitioners seeking to improve the efficiency and accuracy of differential diagnoses in clinical diagnostics using data analysis.

Indexed as

cartesian coordinate systemdifferential diagnosisinterpretable feature representationLatent Dirichlet Allocationtextual medical record

Identifiers

PMID38247906
PMCPMC10813342
OpenAlexW4390272967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.