ReviewEpigenomes2023
The Genomic Shock Hypothesis: Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations of Transposable Elements after Interspecific Hybridization in Plants.
Review in Epigenomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonadditive gene expression and reduced homoeolog expression bias in an intraspecific hexaploid wheat hybrid.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Stones in genomic storms: transposable element-driven variation in Prunus fruit trees.Mobile DNA · 2026Review
- Patterns of base chromosome numbers, genome size and rDNA loci evolution in the genusFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Molecular Mimicry of Transposable Elements in Plants.Plant & cell physiology · 2025Review
- Natural neopolyploids: a stimulus for novel research.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- Transposon proliferation drives genome architecture and regulatory evolution in wild and domesticated peppers.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Allotetraploid nature of a wild potato species, Solanum stoloniferum Schlechtd. et Bché., as revealed by whole-genome sequencing.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Genome Variability in Artificial Allopolyploid Hybrids ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Ancient hybridization and repetitive element proliferation in the evolutionary history of the monocot genusFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) are major components of plant genomes with the ability to change their position in the genome or to create new copies of themselves in other positions in the genome. These can cause gene disruption and large-scale genomic alterations, including inversions, deletions, and duplications. Host organisms have evolved a set of mechanisms to suppress TE activity and counter the threat that they pose to genome integrity. These includes the epigenetic silencing of TEs mediated by a process of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM). In most cases, the silencing machinery is very efficient for the vast majority of TEs. However, there are specific circumstances in which TEs can evade such silencing mechanisms, for example, a variety of biotic and abiotic stresses or in vitro culture. Hybridization is also proposed as an inductor of TE proliferation. In fact, the discoverer of the transposons, Barbara McClintock, first hypothesized that interspecific hybridization provides a "genomic shock" that inhibits the TE control mechanisms leading to the mobilization of TEs. However, the studies carried out on this topic have yielded diverse results, showing in some cases a total absence of mobilization or being limited to only some TE families. Here, we review the current knowledge about the impact of interspecific hybridization on TEs in plants and the possible implications of changes in the epigenetic mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.