Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38247715›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

COVID-19 Personal Protective Behaviors during Large Social Events: The Value of Behavioral Observations.

Ashley Gould, Lesley Lewis, Lowri Evans, Leanne Greening, Holly Howe-Davies, Jonathan West, Chris Roberts, John A Parkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mission, activities, and ways of working at the Behavioural Science Unit of Public Health Wales.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Review
  3. Promoting Behavioral Change to Improve Health Outcomes.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Integrating Systems Thinking and Behavioural Science.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley GouldPublic Health Wales, Cardif CF10 4BZ, UK.
Lesley LewisSomerset Council, Somerset TA1 4DY, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-4959
Lowri EvansCostain Group Ltd., Maidenhead SL6 4UB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-0669
Leanne GreeningSchool of Management, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK.
Holly Howe-DaviesWelsh Government, Cardiff CF10 3NQ, UK.
Jonathan WestPublic Health Wales, Cardif CF10 4BZ, UK.
Chris RobertsWelsh Government, Cardiff CF10 3NQ, UK.
John A ParkinsonWales Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5605-3115
Public Health Wales · GBWelsh Government · GBBangor University · GBCostain (United Kingdom) · GBSomerset County Council · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the context of reopening society in the summer of 2021, as the UK moved away from 'lockdowns', the Government of Wales piloted the return of organized 'mass gatherings' of people at a number of test events. The current study reports behavioral observations that were made at two of the test events to inform this process. The researchers were particularly interested in four key factors: how (1) context within a venue, (2) environmental design, (3) staffing and social norms, and (4) time across an event, affected the personal protective behaviors of social distancing and face-covering use. Data collection was undertaken by trained observers. Adherence to protective behaviors was generally high, but there is clear evidence that these behaviors were shaped in a systematic way by the environment, situational cues, and the passage of time during the events. Some instances of large-scale non-adherence to personal protective behaviors were documented. An analysis within a dual-process framework suggests ways to understand and respond to supporting target health behaviors in groups of people where intervention is deemed valuable, such as in complex or ambiguous contexts. This is one of the first studies to include a 'true' behavioral measure in understanding human responses to COVID-19. It demonstrates that behavioral observations can add precision and granularity to understanding human behavior in complex real-world contexts. Given the significant physical and mental health burden created acutely and chronically by COVID-19, this work has implications for how governments and organizations support target populations in other complex challenges facing us today, such as in sustainability, and healthy lifestyle behaviors. An individual's intentions are not always matched by their actions, and so the findings support a balanced liberal paternalistic approach where system-level changes support appropriate individual-level decisions to engender collective responsibility and action.

Indexed as

behaviorCOVID-19dual-processmass-gatheringobservationprevention

Identifiers

PMID38247715
PMCPMC10813672
OpenAlexW4390944742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.