Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38247685›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Bidirectional Relationship between Adolescent Gender Egalitarianism and Prosocial Behavior.

Xinyuan Fu, Ruoran Fu, Yanping Chang, Zhixu Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinyuan FuDepartment of Psychology, School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-1767
Ruoran FuDepartment of Psychology, School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.
Yanping ChangDepartment of Psychology, School of Sociology and Psychology, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China.
Zhixu YangSchool of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6892-8716

Funding

the 2017 Beijing Social Science Fund: "Psychological Causes and Prevention of School Bullying in Beijing" 17JYC017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the bidirectional associations between gender egalitarianism and prosocial behavior in adolescents, and the moderating effect of gender in the associations, as well as gender differences and longitudinal changes in both. We recruited 543 Chinese adolescents (284 girls, 259 boys; mean age at Time 1 = 11.27 years) and collected three waves of data measuring gender egalitarianism and prosocial behavior at one-year intervals. According to the results, girls expressed greater gender egalitarianism than boys did; girls reported more prosocial behavior than boys in the sixth grade, but there were no significant gender differences in the seventh and eighth grades. Adolescents' gender egalitarianism stayed stable from the sixth to the seventh grade then increased from the seventh to the eighth grade, and there was a decrease in prosocial behavior from the sixth to the seventh grade. More importantly, the results of the multi-group cross-lagged panel model revealed that adolescents' gender egalitarianism in the previous year positively predicted prosocial behavior in the next year, and vice versa; such bidirectional associations equally applied to boys and girls. These findings add to the knowledge of adolescent gender egalitarianism and prosocial behavior, and the dynamic interplay between the two.

Indexed as

adolescencegender egalitarianismmulti-group cross-lagged panel modelprosocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID38247685
PMCPMC10812801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.