Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38247681›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Shifting Perceptions and Emotional Responses to Autonomous Vehicles Using Simulated Experiences.

Jose L Tapia, David Sánchez-Borda, Carmen Iniesta, Francisco Badea, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose L TapiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28043 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9984-2974
David Sánchez-BordaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28043 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-5258-8684
Carmen IniestaEscuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Nebrija, 28015 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5217-289X
Francisco BadeaEscuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Nebrija, 28015 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6213-7203
Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28043 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-8559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The societal integration of autonomous vehicles (AVs) relies on public acceptance, closely related to individual emotions and perceptions. This study explores the emotional factors affecting AV acceptance in Spain through lexical tasks, virtual AV simulations, and questionnaires, surpassing traditional attitude surveys by examining subtle emotional and lexical reactions to AVs. Acceptance was measured in terms of AV knowledge, perception of autonomous driving, and safety, with emphasis on lexical-emotional analysis after simulation. Findings indicate gender differences in AV acceptance, with women showing less knowledge and comfort with AV technology. Simulation improved understanding and generated more positive responses. This study shows how lexical tasks can reveal emotional influences on AV perception and suggests a wider approach to assess technology acceptance. These findings aid in creating campaigns and experiences to enhance public AV acceptance, mindful of demographic differences. Future studies should extend this framework to various populations to investigate the emotional lexicon's role in AV acceptance.

Indexed as

autonomous vehiclesdemographic influencesemotional lexiconlexical selection taskpublic acceptance

Identifiers

PMID38247681
PMCPMC10813087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.