Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38247433›Full record

ReviewCardiology journal2024

Advances in myocarditis management in the light of the latest research and recent guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.

Aleksandra Chabior, Agata Tymińska, Agnieszka Pawlak, Andrea Giordani, Alida Caforio, Marcin Grabowski, Krzysztof Ozierański

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis: Insights from Preclinical Models to Translational Perspectives.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Cardiovascular Complications from Tuberculosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aleksandra ChabiorFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Agata TymińskaFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka PawlakDepartment of Cardiology, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrea GiordaniCardiology, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
Alida CaforioCardiology, Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy.
Marcin GrabowskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof OzierańskiFirst Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. krzysztof.ozieranski@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocarditis remains an unknown disease with varying clinical manifestations, often leading to heart failure. The latest 2021 and 2022 guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) are the first official European documents updating knowledge on the diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis since the 2013 ESC expert consensus statement. These guidelines and new studies allow standardization and improvements to the management of myocarditis. In this review, we discuss the most important aspects of myocarditis diagnosis, therapies and follow-up based on current knowledge.

Indexed as

CardiologyMyocarditisPractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalDisease ManagementEuropeHumanscardio-immunologyendomyocardial biopsyheart failureimmunosuppressioninflammatory cardiomyopathypersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID38247433
PMCPMC11076022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.