Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38246994›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

Sugar and blood: the nutritional priorities of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti.

Frank Chelestino Tenywa, Jeremiah John Musa, Revocatus Musyangi Musiba, Johnson Kyeba Swai, Ahmad Bakar Mpelepele, Fredros Oketch Okumu, Marta Ferreira Maia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Entropy generation in the Malpighian tubule and its comparison with the mammalian nephron.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Host-Seeking and Sugar-Feeding Behaviors ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Frank Chelestino TenywaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania. ftenywa@ihi.or.tz.
Jeremiah John MusaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Revocatus Musyangi MusibaEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Johnson Kyeba SwaiEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Ahmad Bakar MpelepeleEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Fredros Oketch OkumuEnvironmental Health and Ecological Sciences Thematic Group, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania.
Marta Ferreira MaiaKEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Centre for Geographic Medicine Research -Coast, PO Box, Kilifi, 230-80108, Kenya.
Ifakara Health Institute · TZNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology · TZAngkor Hospital for Children · KH

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugar-feeding behaviour is essential for mosquito survival and reproduction, and has been exploited to develop new control strategies, such as the attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSB). This study examined the sugar-feeding habits of the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti, in semi-field conditions to determine the optimal timing (age) of sugar meals and whether the availability of sugar sources could affect blood-feeding by these mosquitoes.

methodsA series of paired-choice assays were conducted in which mosquitoes were allowed to choose between a sugar meal or a blood meal directly from a rabbit. Female 1-day-old mosquitoes were given meal choices in cages I-V and observed for feeding choice in only one cage every day for 5 days starting with cages I to V. The preference of Ae. aegypti to feed on sugar or blood and the effect of sugar source availability on blood-feeding was assessed at different chronological and physiological ages.

resultsIn the first 5 days post-emergence, there was no significant difference in mosquito preference for sugar or blood meals. However, after the first gonotrophic cycle, they had a greater preference for blood over sugar (odds ratio, OR [95% confidence interval, CI] = 9.4 [6.7-13.0]; P < 0.001). Nulliparous Ae. aegypti females (≤ 5-day-old mosquitoes) were less likely to blood-feed if both sugar and blood sources were concurrently available (OR = 0.06 [0.02-0.16]; P < 0.001).

conclusionsNewly emerged females of Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were equally likely to choose a sugar meal or a blood meal. However, after the first gonotrophic cycle, they had a greater preference for blood over sugar. Additionally, nulliparous female mosquitoes were less likely to blood-feed when both sugar and blood sources were available. These findings provide insights into the sugar-feeding behaviour of Ae. aegypti and can inform the development and optimization of new control strategies such as using ATSB.

Indexed as

AedesDengueAnimalsBiological AssayFemaleMosquito VectorsSugarsSugarsAedes aegyptiAttractive targeted sugar baits (ATSB)Blood-feedingDengue vectorsSugar-feeding

Identifiers

PMID38246994
PMCPMC10800037
OpenAlexW4391065991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.