ArticleESC heart failure2024
Development and validation of the self-volume management behaviour questionnaire for patients with chronic heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facilitators and barriers to volume management interventions in patients with heart failure and hyponatremia: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic, disease-related and lifestyle determinants of health-related quality of life among older patients hospitalized with heart failure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Latent profile and influencing factors of volume management behaviors in patients with chronic heart failure: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the self-volume management behaviour questionnaire for patients with chronic heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe aim to develop and validate a questionnaire on the behaviour of self-volume management of patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND
resultsBased on the specific situation theory of heart failure self-care, the items of this questionnaire were formed through literature review and expert consultation. Content validity is judged by expert consultation. Item analysis was used for further filter entries. Cronbach's alpha and retest were used for reliability. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to test the structural validity. The questionnaire finally contained 3 subscales and 22 items. The Cronbach's α was between 0.732 and 0.797. The reliability of the retest was between 0.983 and 0.998. In expert consultation, the I-CVI of each item was 0.92-1, and the S-CVI of each subscale was 0.99, 1.00, and 0.99. In exploratory factor analysis, each subscale has two factors. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model fits of the three subscales were good: χ
conclusionsThe study has shown that the questionnaire on the behaviour of self-volume management of patients with chronic heart failure has good reliability and validity. It can be used as an evaluation tool for evaluating the self-volume management behaviour of patients with chronic heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.