White Matter Structural Connectivity Associated With Visual Field Recovery After Stroke.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Personalized Visual Perceptual Learning Digital Therapy for Visual Field Defects Following Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025
   Trial
2. Digital therapy using dichoptic visual perceptual learning to improve stereopsis in children with intermittent exotropia.Frontiers in digital health · 2026
   Article
3. Customized Visual Discrimination Digital Therapy According to Visual Field Defects in Chronic Stroke Patients.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2024
   Article
4. Post-stroke dizziness in anterior vs. posterior circulation ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.