Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38246400›Full record

SynthesisFertility and sterility2024

The impact of fibroid treatments on quality of life and mental health: a systematic review.

Brooke Neumann, Bhuchitra Singh, Joshua Brennan, Jaime Blanck, James H Segars

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Fertility and sterility, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Successful pregnancies following individualized treatment for diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis: A report of 5 cases].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brooke NeumannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inspira, Vineland, New Jersey.
Bhuchitra SinghDivision of Reproductive Sciences and Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joshua BrennanDivision of Reproductive Sciences and Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jaime BlanckInformationist Services, Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
James H SegarsDivision of Reproductive Sciences and Women's Health Research, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: jsegars2@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USInspira Medical Center Vineland · US

Funding

1/4 Reproductive Medicine Collaborative Consortium: a randomized placebo-controlled trial of EGCG to improve fertility in women with uterine fibroidsR01HD100365 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, VALERIE LYNN, SEGARS, JAMES H. · 2019 to 2023
$988k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroids significantly impact the quality of life (QOL) and mental health of affected women. However, there are limited comparative data on QOL measures after medical, surgical, and radiologic interventions in women with fibroids. This study aimed to assess the current literature evaluating the impact of fibroids on QOL measures using several validated questionnaires for radiologic, medical, or surgical interventions or a combination of interventions before and after treatment. PubMed, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from January 1990 to October 2023 to evaluate the available evidence, and the risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0 or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review criteria included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies that included premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids, confirmed by imaging, who underwent an intervention to target fibroid disease. Only reports using validated questionnaires with a numerical baseline (pretreatment) and posttreatment scores were included. The exclusion criteria included perimenopausal or postmenopausal patients, conditions in addition to uterine fibroids that share similar symptoms, or studies that did not focus on QOL assessment. Abstracts were screened, and full texts were reviewed to determine whether studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 67 studies were included after final review: 18 RCTs and 49 observational studies. All interventions were associated with a significant improvement in uterine fibroid-specific QOL measures, mental health metrics, and a reduction in symptom severity scores after treatment. These data reveal a substantial impact of uterine fibroids on the QOL and mental health of women with fibroids and indicate the metrics that can be used to compare the effectiveness of fibroid treatment options.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaMental HealthQuality of LifeUterine NeoplasmsFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicTreatment Outcomepsychosocial impactquality of lifeUterine fibroidsuterine leiomyomavalidated questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID38246400
PMCPMC11140829
OpenAlexW4391037781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.