Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38246254›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2024

Examining Reactivity and Recovery Patterns of Pain-Evoked Cortisol and Alpha-Amylase Trajectories: Relations Between Psychological Markers of Risk and Resilience.

Ellen L Terry, Lingsong Meng, Zhiguang Huo, Emily J Bartley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen L TerryBiobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence (PRICE), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Lingsong MengDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Zhiguang HuoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Emily J BartleyPain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence (PRICE), University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
University of Florida · US

Funding

UCSD Leading the Advancement of Underrepresented Neuroscientists for Change (LAUNCH) Faculty Development ProgramR25NS117367 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Victoria B Risbrough, Joann Trejo · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
Neural mechanisms underlying psychosocial contributions to ethnic group differences in painK22NS102334 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI TERRY, ELLEN L. · 2018 to 2022
$854k
Adaptability and Resilience in Aging Adults (ARIAA)R00AG052642 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BARTLEY, EMILY J. · 2018 to 2020
$741k
Adaptability and Resilience in Aging Adults (ARIAA)K99AG052642 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BARTLEY, EMILY J. · 2016 to 2017
$233k
NIA NIH HHS K99 AG052642NIA NIH HHS R00 AG052642NINDS NIH HHS K22 NS102334NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS117367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability globally and represents an enormous burden to aging adults. While numerous factors contribute to cLBP, dysregulation in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system functioning have been implicated in its pathogenesis. It is well documented that negative psychological states can modulate biological stress responsivity in chronic pain; however, little is known regarding the influence of positive psychological factors in this relationship. The aim of this study was to examine the association between psychological risk and resilience factors with patterns of physiological stress reactivity and recovery in 60 older adults with cLBP. Participants completed measures of hope, optimism, pain catastrophizing, and perceived stress, and underwent psychophysical pain testing assessing responses to painful pressure, heat, and cold stimuli. Salivary samples were obtained prior to pain induction and at 7 time points spanning 90 minutes after pain testing terminated. To examine reactivity and recovery profiles in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and autonomic nervous system function, samples were assayed for cortisol and alpha-amylase, respectively. Results revealed higher levels of hope and optimism were associated with increased cortisol reactivity (p's < .003) and more rapid recovery (p's = .001). Further, pain catastrophizing and perceived stress were associated with cortisol reactivity, with lower levels of these factors predicting larger increases in cortisol from baseline to peak levels (p's < .04). No significant differences in reactivity or recovery patterns emerged for alpha-amylase. Overall, findings highlight the role of psychological risk and resilience factors in modulating physiological stress reactivity. PERSPECTIVE: This article investigated whether psychosocial risk and resilience factors were associated with stress reactivity and recovery in response to laboratory-based pain testing in older adults with chronic low back pain. Results indicate that high resilience factors may be protective by modulating adrenocortical reactivity and recovery profiles.

Indexed as

alpha-AmylasesChronic PainHydrocortisoneResilience, PsychologicalAgedCatastrophizationFemaleHumansHypothalamo-Hypophyseal SystemLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPituitary-Adrenal SystemSalivaStress, Psychologicalalpha-AmylasesHydrocortisoneAlpha-amylaseChronic low back painCortisolOlder adultsResilience

Identifiers

PMID38246254
PMCPMC11128348
OpenAlexW4391058094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.