Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38246183›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2024

The automatic diagnosis artificial intelligence system for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of uterine sarcoma.

Yusuke Toyohara, Kenbun Sone, Katsuhiko Noda, Kaname Yoshida, Shimpei Kato, Masafumi Kaiume, Ayumi Taguchi, Ryo Kurokawa, Yutaka Osuga

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuke ToyoharaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9417-7496
Kenbun SoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. ksone5274@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7218-6401
Katsuhiko NodaSIOS Technology, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-0218
Kaname YoshidaSIOS Technology, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8975-2481
Shimpei KatoDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-9550
Masafumi KaiumeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0707-3187
Ayumi TaguchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5491-3871
Ryo KurokawaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1186-8900
Yutaka OsugaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6660-1066
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

Kanto - Rengo Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology Award and BRIDGE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is efficient for the diagnosis of preoperative uterine sarcoma; however, misdiagnoses may occur. In this study, we developed a new artificial intelligence (AI) system to overcome the limitations of requiring specialists to manually process datasets and a large amount of computer resources.

methodsThe AI system comprises a tumor image filter, which extracts MRI slices containing tumors, and sarcoma evaluator, which diagnoses uterine sarcomas. We used 15 types of MRI patient sequences to train deep neural network (DNN) models used by tumor filter and sarcoma evaluator with 8 cross-validation sets. We implemented tumor filter and sarcoma evaluator using ensemble prediction technique with 9 DNN models. Ten tumor filters and sarcoma evaluator sets were developed to evaluate fluctuation accuracy. Finally, AutoDiag-AI was used to evaluate the new validation dataset, including 8 cases of sarcomas and 24 leiomyomas.

resultsTumor image filter and sarcoma evaluator accuracies were 92.68% and 90.50%, respectively. AutoDiag-AI with the original dataset accuracy was 89.32%, with 90.47% sensitivity and 88.95% specificity, whereas AutoDiag-AI with the new validation dataset accuracy was 92.44%, with 92.25% sensitivity and 92.50% specificity.

conclusionOur newly established AI system automatically extracts tumor sites from MRI images and diagnoses them as uterine sarcomas without human intervention. Its accuracy is comparable to that of a radiologist. With further validation, the system could be applied for diagnosis of other diseases. Further improvement of the system's accuracy may enable its clinical application in the future.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerSarcomaUterine NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSarcoma

Identifiers

PMID38246183
PMCPMC11107276
OpenAlexW4389466554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.