Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38246064›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine online2024

Seeking arrangements: cell contact as a cleavage-stage biomarker.

Chloe He, Neringa Karpavičiūtė, Rishabh Hariharan, Lilly Lees, Céline Jacques, Timothy Ferrand, Jérôme Chambost, Koen Wouters, Jonas Malmsten, Ryan Miller and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chloe HeWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London 43-45 Foley St, London, W1W 7TY, UK.; Department of Computer Science, University College London, 66-72 Gower St, London WC1E 6EA, UK.; AI Team, Apricity, 14 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1 X 8HN, UK.. Electronic address: chloe.he.21@ucl.ac.uk.
Neringa KarpavičiūtėAI Team, Apricity, 14 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1 X 8HN, UK.
Rishabh HariharanAI Team, Apricity, 14 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1 X 8HN, UK.
Lilly LeesAI Team, Apricity, 14 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1 X 8HN, UK.
Céline JacquesApricity, 13 Rue Paul Valéry, 75116 Paris, France.
Timothy FerrandApricity, 13 Rue Paul Valéry, 75116 Paris, France.
Jérôme ChambostApricity, 13 Rue Paul Valéry, 75116 Paris, France.
Koen WoutersBrussels IVF, University Hospital Brussels, Jette Bldg R, Laarbeeklaan 101 1090 Jette, Belgium, Brussels.
Jonas MalmstenRonald O Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Ave 6th floor, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Ryan MillerRonald O Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Ave 6th floor, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Nikica ZaninovicRonald O Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Ave 6th floor, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Francisco VasconcelosWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London 43-45 Foley St, London, W1W 7TY, UK.; Department of Computer Science, University College London, 66-72 Gower St, London WC1E 6EA, UK.
Cristina HickmanAI Team, Apricity, 14 Grays Inn Rd, London WC1 X 8HN, UK.; Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, Du Cane Road, London, W12 0HS, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionWhat can three-dimensional cell contact networks tell us about the developmental potential of cleavage-stage human embryos?

designThis pilot study was a retrospective analysis of two Embryoscope imaging datasets from two clinics. An artificial intelligence system was used to reconstruct the three-dimensional structure of embryos from 11-plane focal stacks. Networks of cell contacts were extracted from the resulting embryo three-dimensional models and each embryo's mean contacts per cell was computed. Unpaired t-tests and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were used to statistically analyse mean cell contact outcomes. Cell contact networks from different embryos were compared with identical embryos with similar cell arrangements.

resultsAt t4, a higher mean number of contacts per cell was associated with greater rates of blastulation and blastocyst quality. No associations were found with biochemical pregnancy, live birth, miscarriage or ploidy. At t8, a higher mean number of contacts was associated with increased blastocyst quality, biochemical pregnancy and live birth. No associations were found with miscarriage or aneuploidy. Mean contacts at t4 weakly correlated with those at t8. Four-cell embryos fell into nine distinct cell arrangements; the five most common accounted for 97% of embryos. Eight-cell embryos, however, displayed a greater degree of variation with 59 distinct cell arrangements.

conclusionsEvidence is provided for the clinical relevance of cleavage-stage cell arrangement in the human preimplantation embryo beyond the four-cell stage, which may improve selection techniques for day-3 transfers. This pilot study provides a strong case for further investigation into spatial biomarkers and three-dimensional morphokinetics.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAneuploidyArtificial IntelligenceBiomarkersBlastocystCleavage Stage, OvumEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers3D reconstructionCell arrangementCell contactCleavage stageEmbryologyNetwork analysis

Identifiers

PMID38246064
PMCPMC11139661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.