ReviewBiophysical journal2024
Computational and experimental approaches to quantify protein binding interactions under confinement.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two δ-catenins, plakophilin 4 and p120, promote formation of distinct types of adherens junctions.The Journal of cell biology · 2026Article
- Single Molecule Kinetic Fingerprinting of Glycans on IgA1 Antibodies.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Crowded environments and confinement alter the interactions of adhesion proteins confined to membranes or narrow, crowded gaps at adhesive contacts. Experimental approaches and theoretical frameworks were developed to quantify protein binding constants in these environments. However, recent predictions and the complexity of some protein interactions proved challenging to address with prior experimental or theoretical approaches. This perspective highlights new methods developed by these authors that address these challenges. Specifically, single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer and single-molecule tracking measurements were developed to directly image the binding/unbinding rates of membrane-tethered cadherins. Results identified predicted cis (lateral) interactions, which control cadherin clustering on membranes but were not detected in solution. Kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, based on a realistic model of cis cadherin interactions, were developed to extract binding/unbinding rate constants from heterogeneous single-molecule data. The extension of single-molecule fluorescence measurements to cis and trans (adhesive) cadherin interactions at membrane junctions identified unexpected cooperativity between cis and trans binding that appears to enhance intercellular binding kinetics. Comparisons of intercellular binding kinetics, kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, and single-molecule fluorescence data suggest a strategy to bridge protein binding kinetics across length scales. Although cadherin is the focus of these studies, the approaches can be extended to other intercellular adhesion proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.