ArticleMobile DNA2024
A systematic screen for co-option of transposable elements across the fungal kingdom.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome reshaping by Helitron transposons in Fusarium oxysporum TR4 affects secondary metabolism but not virulence.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Transposable elements hitchhike on Starships across fungal genomes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Transposable element dynamics in Arthropoda genomes and their impacts on the evolution of functional genes.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Patterns and mechanisms of fungal genome plasticity.Current biology : CB · 2025Review
- Transposable Elements Drive Regulatory and Functional Innovation of F-box Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Low-complexity regions in fungi display functional groups and are depleted in positively charged amino acids.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How novel protein functions are acquired is a central question in molecular biology. Key paths to novelty include gene duplications, recombination or horizontal acquisition. Transposable elements (TEs) are increasingly recognized as a major source of novel domain-encoding sequences. However, the impact of TE coding sequences on the evolution of the proteome remains understudied. Here, we analyzed 1237 genomes spanning the phylogenetic breadth of the fungal kingdom. We scanned proteomes for evidence of co-occurrence of TE-derived domains along with other conventional protein functional domains. We detected more than 13,000 predicted proteins containing potentially TE-derived domain, of which 825 were identified in more than five genomes, indicating that many host-TE fusions may have persisted over long evolutionary time scales. We used the phylogenetic context to identify the origin and retention of individual TE-derived domains. The most common TE-derived domains are helicases derived from Academ, Kolobok or Helitron. We found putative TE co-options at a higher rate in genomes of the Saccharomycotina, providing an unexpected source of protein novelty in these generally TE depleted genomes. We investigated in detail a candidate host-TE fusion with a heterochromatic transcriptional silencing function that may play a role in TE and gene regulation in ascomycetes. The affected gene underwent multiple full or partial losses within the phylum. Overall, our work establishes a kingdom-wide view of putative host-TE fusions and facilitates systematic investigations of candidate fusion proteins.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.