Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245704›Full record

SynthesisBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024

The effects of rhythmic auditory stimulation on functional ambulation after stroke: a systematic review.

Samira Gonzalez-Hoelling, Gloria Reig-García, Carme Bertran-Noguer, Rosa Suñer-Soler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07428824 (Effects of Functional Action Observation Therapy With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing on Balance and Gait in Patients With Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07428824 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Functional Action Observation Therapy With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing on Balance and Gait in Patients With Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsStrokeArmsFunctional Action Observation Therapy, Functional Action Observation Therapy with rhythmic auditory stimulation group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samira Gonzalez-HoellingNeurorehabilitation department, Hospital Sociosanitari Mutuam Girona, 17007, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4231-3702
Gloria Reig-GarcíaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, University of Girona, 17003, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3893-4231
Carme Bertran-NoguerHealth and Health Care Research Group, University of Girona, 17003, Girona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-7082
Rosa Suñer-SolerHealth and Health Care Research Group, University of Girona, 17003, Girona, Spain. rosa.sunyer@udg.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-9112
Universitat de Girona · ESClínica Girona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have reported the effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) on functional ambulation in stroke patients, yet no systematic overview has yet been published. This study aims to synthesize the available evidence describing changes in stroke patients after RAS intervention for functional ambulation and the use of walking assistive devices, and to find out if the effect of RAS and music-based RAS differs depending on the lesioned area.

methodsThe PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL electronic databases were searched for reports evaluating the effect of RAS on walking in stroke patients, applying the PICOS criteria for the inclusion of studies.

resultsTwenty one articles were included (948 stroke survivors). Most studies were of good methodological quality according to the PEDro scale, but they had a high risk of bias. The most consistent finding was that RAS improves walking and balance parameters in stroke patients in all phases compared to baseline and versus control groups with conventional treatment. Functional ambulation and the use of walking assistive devices were inconsistently reported. Several studies also suggest that RAS may be as good as other complementary therapies (horse-riding and visual cueing).

conclusionsDespite the beneficial effects of RAS, the question remains as to whether it is better than other complementary therapies. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, the interventions in control groups, the varied durations, and the different outcome measures, we suggest that care should be taken in interpreting and generalizing findings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42021277940.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareWalkingMusic therapyRehabilitationWalking abilityWalking aids

Identifiers

PMID38245704
PMCPMC10799424
OpenAlexW4391052546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.