Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245697›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2024

The (un)caring experienced by racialized and/or ethnoculturally diverse residents in supportive living: a qualitative study.

Stephanie A Chamberlain, Jordana Salma, Hongmei Tong, Savera, Jingfeng Wu, Andrea Gruneir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prevalent Diagnosed Depression in Relation to Contextual Isolation Among Nursing Home Residents in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie A ChamberlainFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. sachambe@ualberta.ca.
Jordana SalmaFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Hongmei TongFaculty of Health and Community Studies, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
SaveraFaculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jingfeng WuEngineering Education Research, College of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Andrea GruneirDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

University of Alberta Intersections of Gender Research Development Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacialized and/or ethnocultural minority older adults in supportive living settings may not have access to appropriate services and activities. Most supportive living facilities are mainstream (not specific to one group); however, culturally specific facilities are purpose-built to accommodate older adults from a particular group. Our objective was to describe the perspectives of diverse participants about access to culturally appropriate care, accessible services, and social and recreation activities in culturally specific and mainstream (non-specific) supportive living facilities.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 people (11 staff, 8 family members, 2 residents) from 7 supportive living homes (2 culturally specific and 5 mainstream) in Alberta, Canada. We used a rapid qualitative inquiry approach to structure the data collection and analysis.

resultsStaff and family members described challenges in accessing culturally appropriate care in mainstream facilities. Family members expressed guilt and shame when their relative moved to supportive living, and they specifically described long waitlists for beds in culturally specific homes. Once in the facility, language barriers contributed to quality of care issues (e.g., delayed assessments) and challenges accessing recreation and social activities in both mainstream and culturally specific homes. Mainstream facilities often did not have appropriate food options and had limited supports for religious practices. Residents who had better English language proficiency had an easier transition to supportive living.

conclusionsRacialized and/or ethnoculturally diverse residents in mainstream supportive living facilities did not receive culturally appropriate care. Creating standalone facilities for every cultural group is not feasible; therefore, we must improve the care in mainstream facilities, including recruiting more diverse staff and integrating a wider range of recreation and religious services and food options.

Indexed as

FamilyLanguageAgedAlbertaHumansCulturally appropriate careDiverse residentsSupportive living

Identifiers

PMID38245697
PMCPMC10800051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.