Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245686›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2024

Up-to-date quality survey and evaluation of neonatal screening programs in China.

Jinming Zhang, Lizi Jin, Penghui Feng, Yu Fei, Wen Li, Ting Jiang, Zehao Zhang, Falin He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinming ZhangNational Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Lizi JinNational Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China.
Penghui FengChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yu FeiWest China School of Public Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wen LiWest China School of Public Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ting JiangWest China School of Public Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zehao ZhangWest China School of Public Health, West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Falin HeNational Center for Clinical Laboratories, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Hospital/National Center of Gerontology, Beijing, China. hefalin@126.com.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7234411China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M740320National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC1002204Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 3332023008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo thoroughly evaluate the quality of the entire process of neonatal screening (NBS) in China.

methodsWe collected survey questionnaires from 54.4% (135/248) of NBS institutions in China and conducted on-site visits to 20 of these facilities to validate the data. The quality performance of the institutions was evaluated, and differences across various factors were analysed.

resultsMerely 62.5% of the provinces had acceptable performance in neonatal screening. Institutions with limited staff were more prone to organizational management shortcomings. Institutions in provinces with a per capita GDP below 10,000 USD exhibited lower quality control levels than those with a per capita GDP between 10,000 and 15,000 USD. Obstetrics departments have a lower awareness of quality control compared to other blood collection facilities.

conclusionsA nationwide, comprehensive quality control system for continuous enhancements in quality management, screening, diagnosis, and treatment is imperative to ensure prompt diagnosis and intervention.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningChinaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesNeonatal screeningQuality evaluationQuality managementQuality performance

Identifiers

PMID38245686
PMCPMC10799474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.