ArticleScientific reports2024
The value of computed tomography angiography in predicting the surgical effect and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The predictive value of serum 25(OH)D, AQP4, and IL-4 levels for edema volume and clinical prognosis after traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Neuroimaging for neurovascular complications of traumatic brain injury.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Clinical study of computerized tomography angiography and computerized tomography perfusion in severe traumatic brain injury by a multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is difficult to predict the surgical effect and outcome of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) before surgery. This study aims to approve an evaluation method of computed tomography angiography (CTA) to predict the effect of surgery and outcome in severe TBI. Between January 2010 and January 2020, we retrospectively reviewed 358 severe TBI patients who underwent CTA at admission and reexamination. CTA data were evaluated for the presence of cerebrovascular changes, including cerebrovascular shift (CS), cerebral vasospasm (CVS), large artery occlusion (LAO), and deep venous system occlusion (DVSO). Medical records were reviewed for baseline clinical characteristics and the relationship between CTA changes and outcomes. Cerebrovascular changes were identified in 247 (69.0%) of 358 severe TBI patients; only 25 (10.12%) of them had poor outcomes, and 162 (65.6%) patients had a good recovery. Eighty-three (23.18%) patients were diagnosed with CVS, 10 (12.05%) had a good outcome, 57 (68.67%) had severe disability and 16 (19.28%) had a poor outcome. There were twenty-six (7.3%) patients who had LAO and thirty-one (8.7%) patients who had DVSO; no patients had good recovery regardless of whether they had the operation or not. Cerebrovascular injuries and changes are frequent after severe TBI and correlate closely with prognosis. CTA is an important tool in evaluating the severity, predicting the operation effect and prognosis, and guiding therapy for severe TBI. Well-designed, multicenter, randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the value of CTA for severe TBI in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.