Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245552›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2024

Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with liquid biopsies and multiparametric MRI in patients with breast cancer.

L M Janssen, M H A Janse, B B L Penning de Vries, B H M van der Velden, E J M Wolters-van der Ben, S M van den Bosch, A Sartori, C Jovelet, M J Agterof, D Ten Bokkel Huinink and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Potential Role ofClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

L M JanssenImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M H A JanseImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0604-1204
B B L Penning de VriesJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B H M van der VeldenImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E J M Wolters-van der BenDepartment of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
S M van den BoschPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
A SartoriAgena Bioscience GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
C JoveletStilla Technologies, Villejuif, France.
M J AgterofDepartment of Medical Oncology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
D Ten Bokkel HuininkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Alexander Monro Hospital, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
E W Bouman-WammesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
P J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E van der WallDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S G EliasJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
K G A GilhuijsImage Sciences Institute, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. K.G.A.Gilhuijs@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-8649
Utrecht University · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLAlexander Monro Ziekenhuis · NLPhilips (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 755333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can help tailor treatment to individual patients' needs. Little is known about the combination of liquid biopsies and computer extracted features from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of NAC response in breast cancer. Here, we report on a prospective study with the aim to explore the predictive potential of this combination in adjunct to standard clinical and pathological information before, during and after NAC. The study was performed in four Dutch hospitals. Patients without metastases treated with NAC underwent 3 T multiparametric MRI scans before, during and after NAC. Liquid biopsies were obtained before every chemotherapy cycle and before surgery. Prediction models were developed using penalized linear regression to forecast residual cancer burden after NAC and evaluated for pathologic complete response (pCR) using leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV). Sixty-one patients were included. Twenty-three patients (38%) achieved pCR. Most prediction models yielded the highest estimated LOOCV area under the curve (AUC) at the post-treatment timepoint. A clinical-only model including tumor grade, nodal status and receptor subtype yielded an estimated LOOCV AUC for pCR of 0.76, which increased to 0.82 by incorporating post-treatment radiological MRI assessment (i.e., the "clinical-radiological" model). The estimated LOOCV AUC was 0.84 after incorporation of computer-extracted MRI features, and 0.85 when liquid biopsy information was added instead of the radiological MRI assessment. Adding liquid biopsy information to the clinical-radiological resulted in an estimated LOOCV AUC of 0.86. In conclusion, inclusion of liquid biopsy-derived markers in clinical-radiological prediction models may have potential to improve prediction of pCR after NAC in breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID38245552
PMCPMC10799888
OpenAlexW4391044438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.