ReviewNPJ science of food2024
An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains.
Review in NPJ science of food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occurrence of Food Chemical Contaminants in Entomophagy: Implications for Food Safety and Future Risk Assessment-A Scoping Review.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Article
- Insects as an Alternative Protein Source: A Sustainable Approach to Future Food Security.Insects · 2026Review
- Edible Insects: Food Safety Challenges and Regulatory Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review of improving the microbiological safety of edible insects using thermal and non-thermal processing technologies.Journal of animal science and technology · 2026Review
- Insect proteins and peptides: preparation, bioactivities, and applications.Food science of animal resources · 2026Article
- Ethnoentomology (1952-2024): scientific production, emerging trends and research gaps.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025Review
- Duplex PCR Detection and Differentiation of Insect DNAInsects · 2025Article
- Review
- A perspective by the German NRZ-Authent on information and knowledge management in governmental authorities.NPJ science of food · 2025Review
- Entomophagy: Nutritional Value, Benefits, Regulation and Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Optimising Nutrition for Sustainable Pig Production: Strategies to Quantify and Mitigate Environmental Impact.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Enhancing sustainability in meat production through insect biorefinery.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Megatrends and emerging issues: Impacts on food safety.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
- Edible Insects from the Perspective of Sustainability-A Review of the Hazards and Benefits.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Opportunities and challenges for global food safety in advancing circular policies and practices in agrifood systems.NPJ science of food · 2024Review
- Bacterial Contamination and Antimicrobial Resistance in Two-Spotted (Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food consumption play a crucial role in human life, yet conventional food production and consumption patterns can be detrimental to the environment. Thus, research and development has been directed towards alternative proteins, with edible insects being promising sources. Edible insects have been recognised for their sustainable benefits providing protein, with less emission of greenhouse gas, land and water usage compared to sources, such as beef, chicken, and dairy products. Among the over 2000 known edible insect species, only four, namely yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), migratory locust/grasshopper (Locusta migratoria), grain mould beetle, also known as lesser mealworm which is a larval form of Alphitobius diaperinus (from the family of Tenebrionidae of darkling beetles) and house cricket (Acheta domesticus), are currently authorised in specific products through specific producers in the EU. The expansion of such foods into Western diets face challenges such as consumer barriers, gaps in microbiological and chemical safety hazard data during production and processing, and the potential for fraudulent supply chain activity. The main aim of this study was to map the supply chain, through interviews with personnel along the supply chain, coupled with searches for relevant publications and governmental documents. Thus, the main potential points of food safety and fraud along the edible insect supply chain were identified. Feed substrate was identified as the main area of concern regarding microbiological and chemical food safety and novel processing techniques were forecast to be of most concern for future fraudulent activity. Despite the on-going authorisation of insect species in many countries there are substantial food safety and authenticity information gaps in this industry that need to be addressed before edible insects can be viewed as a safe and sustainable protein sources by Western consumers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.