Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245516›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Ramping dynamics and theta oscillations reflect dissociable signatures during rule-guided human behavior.

Jan Weber, Anne-Kristin Solbakk, Alejandro O Blenkmann, Anais Llorens, Ingrid Funderud, Sabine Leske, Pål Gunnar Larsson, Jugoslav Ivanovic, Robert T Knight, Tor Endestad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Conjunctive population coding integrates sensory evidence to guide adaptive behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Predictive encoding of auditory sequences in the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Distributed Intracranial Activity Underlying Human Decision-making Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jan WeberHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center for Neurology, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4535-6572
Anne-Kristin SolbakkDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9486-5440
Alejandro O BlenkmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8671-2214
Anais LlorensDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid FunderudDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sabine LeskeDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pål Gunnar LarssonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-8970
Jugoslav IvanovicDepartment of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Robert T KnightHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8686-1685
Tor EndestadDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Randolph F HelfrichHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center for Neurology, University Medical Center Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. randolph.helfrich@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8045-3111

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Attention, Orientation and the Human Prefrontal CortexR01NS021135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 1985 to 2026
$6.5M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS021135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contextual cues and prior evidence guide human goal-directed behavior. The neurophysiological mechanisms that implement contextual priors to guide subsequent actions in the human brain remain unclear. Using intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), we demonstrate that increasing uncertainty introduces a shift from a purely oscillatory to a mixed processing regime with an additional ramping component. Oscillatory and ramping dynamics reflect dissociable signatures, which likely differentially contribute to the encoding and transfer of different cognitive variables in a cue-guided motor task. The results support the idea that prefrontal activity encodes rules and ensuing actions in distinct coding subspaces, while theta oscillations synchronize the prefrontal-motor network, possibly to guide action execution. Collectively, our results reveal how two key features of large-scale neural population activity, namely continuous ramping dynamics and oscillatory synchrony, jointly support rule-guided human behavior.

Indexed as

BrainCuesElectroencephalographyHumansTheta Rhythm

Identifiers

PMID38245516
PMCPMC10799948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.