Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38245012›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Taxonomy of teaching methods and their use in health professions education: a scoping review protocol.

Sharon Mitchell, Carolin Sehlbach, Gregor H L Franssen, Janusz Janczukowicz, Sissel Guttormsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sharon MitchellInstitute for Medical Education, Graduate School of Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland sharon.mitchell@unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3725-7366
Carolin SehlbachDepartment of Educational Research and Development, School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9732-1377
Gregor H L FranssenMaastricht University Library, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2347-5095
Janusz JanczukowiczCentre for Medical Education, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-6028
Sissel GuttormsenInstitute for Medical Education, Graduate School of Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionApplying the lens of social constructivist theory, teaching methods facilitate the process of learning and may be used differently across settings to align learning goals. Teaching methods are used across disciplines, occupations and learning settings, yet terminology, descriptions and application for use vary widely. This scoping review will identify eligible literature of reported teaching methods with documented descriptions across disciplines with a focus of how teaching methods are applied to health professions education. A literary description of a teaching method was used as a basis from which to select eligible articles based on two criteria, a specified method and delivery of that teaching by a teacher figure. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the extension of the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology aligned to Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage framework and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, this scoping review will systematically search ERIC, Embase, Web of Science and PubMed databases. The search strategy was supported by an information specialist. Eligible studies will be identified in a two-stage screening process with four researchers. To complement eligible peer-reviewed literature, we will also search out relevant grey literature including University Websites, Conference Programmes and handsearched reference lists. Data extraction will be performed using a developed data extraction tool. A narrative summary will accompany charted results and describe the results aligned to the study objectives. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As no intervention or patient recruitment is required for this research, ethics board approval is not required. Results will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentations and where feasible reaching out to those organisations and universities with published glossaries of terms for teaching.

Indexed as

Health OccupationsTeachingHumansPeer ReviewScoping Reviews as TopicEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)Health EducationMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

Identifiers

PMID38245012
PMCPMC10806689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.