Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38244753›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2024

Individual Differences in Volitional Social Self-Administration and Motivation in Male and Female Mice Following Social Stress.

Jovana Navarrete, Kevin N Schneider, Briana M Smith, Nastacia L Goodwin, Yizhe Y Zhang, Axelle S Salazar, Yahir E Gonzalez, Pranav Anumolu, Ethan Gross, Valerie S Tsai and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Fear Synchrony of Mouse Dyads: Interaction of Sex Composition and Stress.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jovana NavarreteDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kevin N SchneiderDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Briana M SmithDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Nastacia L GoodwinDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Yizhe Y ZhangDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Axelle S SalazarDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Yahir E GonzalezDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Undergraduate Neuroscience Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Pranav AnumoluDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Undergraduate Neuroscience Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ethan GrossDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Valerie S TsaiDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Undergraduate Neuroscience Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Mitra HeshmatiDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Sam A GoldenDepartment of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Center of Excellence in Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: sagolden@uw.edu.

Funding

University of Washington Center of Excellence in Opioid Addiction ResearchP30DA048736 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Charles Chavkin · 2019 to 2026
$13.0M
Nutrition, Obesity and Atherosclerosis Training ProgramT32HL007028 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Karin E Bornfeldt · 1985 to 2026
$6.4M
Integrative single-cell spatial transcriptomic, anatomical, and functional profiling of brain-wide ensembles engaged by opioid relapseR01DA059374 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sam Golden, Liangcai Gu · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Mechanisms of emergence from general anesthesiaR35GM146751 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mitra Heshmati · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Reimbursement request for attending the Meeting of the Jointly Sponsored Institutional Predoctoral Training in the Neurosciences T32 Program Directors in Baltimore, MD on 2/19/19T32NS099578 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SULLIVAN, JANE M, WONG, RACHEL O · 2016 to 2020
$1.4M
Connectomics of relapse to aggression seekingR00DA045662 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOLDEN, SAM · 2019 to 2021
$736k
Cell-type and whole-brain dynamics underlying operant social stress resiliencyF31MH133295 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NAVARRETE, JOVANA · 2023 to 2025
$146k
Dissociable neural mechanisms of reactive versus appetitive aggressionF31MH125587 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOODWIN, NASTACIA · 2021 to 2023
$134k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007028NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA048736NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA045662NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA059374NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146751NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH125587NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH133295NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS099578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key challenge in developing treatments for neuropsychiatric illness is the disconnect between preclinical models and the complexity of human social behavior. We integrate voluntary social self-administration into a rodent model of social stress as a platform for the identification of fundamental brain and behavior mechanisms underlying stress-induced individual differences in social motivation.

methodsHere, we introduced an operant social stress procedure in male and female mice composed of 3 phases: 1) social self-administration training, 2) social stress exposure concurrent with reinforced self-administration testing, and 3) poststress operant testing under nonreinforced and reinforced conditions. We used social-defeat and witness-defeat stress in male and female mice.

resultsSocial defeat attenuated social reward seeking in males but not females, whereas witness defeat had no effect in males but promoted seeking behavior in females. We resolved social stress-induced changes to social motivation by aggregating z-scored operant metrics into a cumulative social index score to describe the spectrum of individual differences exhibited during operant social stress. Clustering does not adequately describe the relative distributions of social motivation following stress and is better described as a nonbinary behavioral distribution defined by the social index score, capturing a dynamic range of stress-related alterations in social motivation inclusive of sex as a biological variable.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that operant social stress can detect stable individual differences in stress-induced changes to social motivation. The inclusion of volitional behavior in social procedures may enhance the understanding of behavioral adaptations that promote stress resiliency and their mechanisms under more naturalistic conditions.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantIndividualityMotivationSelf AdministrationSocial BehaviorStress, PsychologicalAnimalsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRewardSex CharacteristicsRewardSelf-administrationSex differencesSocialStress

Identifiers

PMID38244753
PMCPMC11255129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.