ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2024
Low-frequency Stimulation at the Subiculum Prevents Extensive Secondary Epileptogenesis in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.
Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 1 Hz Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Ameliorates Epilepsy by Suppressing Interferon-γ Signaling-Dependent Microglial Synaptic Phagocytosis in Mice.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Single-Nucleus Transcriptomic Sequencing Revealed Cellular and Molecular Changes in a Pilocarpine-Induced Epilepsy Rat Model.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Low-Frequency Stimulation at the Ventromedial Hypothalamus Exhibits Broad-Spectrum Efficacy Across Models of Epilepsy.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- Novel Mechanism, Drug Target and Therapy in Epilepsy.Neuroscience bulletin · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary epileptogenesis is characterized by increased epileptic susceptibility and a tendency to generate epileptiform activities outside the primary focus. It is one of the major resultants of pharmacoresistance and failure of surgical outcomes in epilepsy, but still lacks effective treatments. Here, we aimed to test the effects of low-frequency stimulation (LFS) at the subiculum for secondary epileptogenesis in a mouse model. Here, secondary epileptogenesis was simulated at regions both contralateral and ipsilateral to the primary focus by applying successive kindling stimuli. Mice kindled at the right CA3 showed higher seizure susceptibilities at both the contralateral CA3 and the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex and had accelerated kindling processes compared with naive mice. LFS at the ipsilateral subiculum during the primary kindling progress at the right CA3 effectively prevented secondary epileptogenesis at both the contralateral CA3 and the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex, characterized by decreased seizure susceptibilities and a retarded kindling process at those secondary foci. Only application along with the primary epileptogenesis was effective. Notably, the effects of LFS on secondary epileptogenesis were associated with its inhibitory effect at the secondary focus through interfering with the enhancement of synaptic connections between the primary and secondary foci. These results imply that LFS at the subiculum is an effective preventive strategy for extensive secondary epileptogenesis in temporal lobe epilepsy and present the subiculum as a target with potential translational importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.