SynthesisWorld journal of urology2024
Focal radiotherapy boost to MR-visible tumor for prostate cancer: a systematic review.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial protocol: RadTARGET, a multicenter phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating focal radiotherapy boost with de-intensification of dose to non-suspicious prostate in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- The role of diffusion-weighted MRI in biological image-guided radiation therapy: a roadmap.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Article
- External beam focal boost radiotherapy to intraprostatic lesions in prostate cancer: a scoping review.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- ESUR: Opportunities for PSMA-PET/CT and whole-body MRI in advanced prostate cancer.European radiology · 2026Review
- Post hoc estimation of a quantitative restriction spectrum imaging biomarker for prostate cancer detection using conventional MRI.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- PrecisionPro Fusion: Clinical validation of an automated, rigid, Prostate-Specific MRI-CT Fusion system for prostate radiotherapy planning.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy with focal boost for high-risk localized prostate cancer (HYPO-RT-PC-boost): in silico evaluation with histological reference.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Article
- Restriction Spectrum Imaging as a Quantitative Biomarker for Prostate Cancer With Reliable Positive Predictive Value.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
- Propensity Score Matched Analysis of External Beam Radiotherapy With or Without Focal Boost to Intraprostatic Lesions in Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2025Article
- Prostate MRI: bridging radiology and radiation oncology for precision radiation therapy.European radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe FLAME trial provides strong evidence that MR-guided external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) focal boost for localized prostate cancer increases biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) without increasing toxicity. Yet, there are many barriers to implementation of focal boost. Our objectives are to systemically review clinical outcomes for MR-guided EBRT focal boost and to consider approaches to increase implementation of this technique.
methodsWe conducted literature searches in four databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline. We included prospective phase II/III trials of patients with localized prostate cancer underdoing definitive EBRT with MR-guided focal boost. The outcomes of interest were bDFS and acute/late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity.
resultsSeven studies were included. All studies had a median follow-up of greater than 4 years. There were heterogeneities in fractionation, treatment planning, and delivery. Studies demonstrated effectiveness, feasibility, and tolerability of focal boost. Based on the Phoenix criteria for biochemical recurrence, the reported 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates ranged 69.7-100% across included studies. All studies reported good safety profiles. The reported ranges of acute/late grade 3 + gastrointestinal toxicities were 0%/1-10%. The reported ranges of acute/late grade 3 + genitourinary toxicities were 0-13%/0-5.6%.
conclusionsThere is strong evidence that it is possible to improve oncologic outcomes without substantially increasing toxicity through MR-guided focal boost, at least in the setting of a 35-fraction radiotherapy regimen. Barriers to clinical practice implementation are addressable through additional investigation and new technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.