ReviewArchives of toxicology2024
Artificial intelligence (AI)-it's the end of the tox as we know it (and I feel fine).
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Regulatory T cells in perioperative neurocognitive disorders: a systematic review with structured narrative synthesis from molecular mechanisms to clinical translation.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in toxicology: current advances, challenges and future directions.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered One Health: A Predictive Framework for Managing Persistent Chemical Threats across Human, Animal, and Environmental Systems.Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ) · 2026Review
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology With Environmental Exposures.Allergy · 2026Review
- Application, challenges and prospects of artificial intelligence in acute poisoning management.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- A review of machine learning in toxicology: current practices and reporting gaps.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for mycotoxin management in food systems.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- Causality analysis of toxicological mechanisms in networked systems such as adverse outcome pathway networks.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Democratizing Artificial Intelligence in Toxicology: Real-World Applications and Automated Computational Workflows.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Review
- Advancing the Discovery of Emerging Contaminants: A Leap in Technology and Data.Environmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Building trust in the integration of artificial intelligence into chemical risk assessment: findings from the 2024 ECETOC workshop.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
- vToxiNet: a biologically constrained deep learning framework for interpretable prediction of drug-induced hepatotoxicity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AI-driven nanomedicine for cancer theranostics.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Advances in pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling for anesthesia, 1987-2024: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Next generation validation for next generation risk assessment.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- AI-based methods for the assessment of DNA damage and repair mechanisms.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- AI redefine untargeted metabolomics: estimating chemical amounts for a Human Exposome Project.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Green toxicology only becomes beautiful through AI.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- AI snake oil? A risk/benefit analysis for toxicology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Navigating the AI Frontier in Toxicology: Trends, Trust, and Transformation.Current environmental health reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid progress of AI impacts diverse scientific disciplines, including toxicology, and has the potential to transform chemical safety evaluation. Toxicology has evolved from an empirical science focused on observing apical outcomes of chemical exposure, to a data-rich field ripe for AI integration. The volume, variety and velocity of toxicological data from legacy studies, literature, high-throughput assays, sensor technologies and omics approaches create opportunities but also complexities that AI can help address. In particular, machine learning is well suited to handle and integrate large, heterogeneous datasets that are both structured and unstructured-a key challenge in modern toxicology. AI methods like deep neural networks, large language models, and natural language processing have successfully predicted toxicity endpoints, analyzed high-throughput data, extracted facts from literature, and generated synthetic data. Beyond automating data capture, analysis, and prediction, AI techniques show promise for accelerating quantitative risk assessment by providing probabilistic outputs to capture uncertainties. AI also enables explanation methods to unravel mechanisms and increase trust in modeled predictions. However, issues like model interpretability, data biases, and transparency currently limit regulatory endorsement of AI. Multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to ensure development of interpretable, robust, and human-centered AI systems. Rather than just automating human tasks at scale, transformative AI can catalyze innovation in how evidence is gathered, data are generated, hypotheses are formed and tested, and tasks are performed to usher new paradigms in chemical safety assessment. Used judiciously, AI has immense potential to advance toxicology into a more predictive, mechanism-based, and evidence-integrated scientific discipline to better safeguard human and environmental wellbeing across diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.