Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243783›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2024

Diagnostic delay in monogenic disease: A scoping review.

Rory J Tinker, Miles Fisher, Alex F Gimeno, Kayce Gill, Camille Ivey, Josh F Peterson, Lisa Bastarache

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decoding Genetic Disease Through the Skin: Lessons From the UDN.International journal of dermatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rory J TinkerDivision of Medical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN. Electronic address: rory.tinker@vumc.org.
Miles FisherVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Child Neurology, Nashville, TN.
Alex F GimenoVanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Kayce GillAnnette and Irwin Eskind Family Biomedical Library and Learning Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Camille IveyAnnette and Irwin Eskind Family Biomedical Library and Learning Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Josh F PetersonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Lisa BastaracheDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Translating the Clinical Knowledge of Mendelian Diseases to Real-world EHR Data to Improve Identification of Undiagnosed PatientsR01HG012657 · NHGRI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lisa Bastarache, Douglas Ruderfer · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012657NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiagnostic delay in monogenic disease is reportedly common. We conducted a scoping review investigating variability in study design, results, and conclusions.

methodsWe searched the academic literature on January 17, 2023, for original peer reviewed journals and conference articles that quantified diagnostic delay in monogenic disease. We abstracted the reported diagnostic delay, relevant study design features, and definitions.

resultsOur search identified 259 articles quantifying diagnostic delay in 111 distinct monogenetic diseases. Median reported diagnostic delay for all studies collectively in monogenetic diseases was 5.0 years (IQR 2-10). There was major variation in the reported delay within individual monogenetic diseases. Shorter delay was associated with disorders of childhood metabolism, immunity, and development. The majority (67.6%) of articles that studied delay reported an improvement with calendar time. Study design and definitions of delay were highly heterogenous. Three gaps were identified: (1) no studies were conducted in the least developed countries, (2) delay has not been studied for the majority of known, or (3) most prevalent genetic diseases.

conclusionHeterogenous study design and definitions of diagnostic delay inhibit comparison across studies. Future efforts should focus on standardizing delay measurements, while expanding the research to low-income countries.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisResearch DesignDeveloping CountriesHumansDiagnostic delayGenetic diseaseInformaticsRare diseaseScoping review

Identifiers

PMID38243783
PMCPMC11140588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.