Observational studyMilitary medicine2024
Dynamics of the Oral Microbiome During Initial Military Training at Fort Benning, Georgia.
Observational study in Military medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbiome dynamics in the congregate environment of U.S. Army Infantry training.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMilitary trainees are at increased risk for infectious disease outbreaks because of the unique circumstances of the training environment (e.g., close proximity areas and physiologic/psychologic stress). Standard medical countermeasures in military training settings include routine immunization (e.g., influenza and adenovirus) as well as chemoprophylaxis [e.g., benzathine penicillin G (Bicillin) for the prevention of group A streptococcal disease] for pathogens associated with outbreaks in these settings. In a population of U.S. Army Infantry trainees, we evaluated changes in the oral microbiome during a 14-week military training cycle. MATERIALS AND
methodsTrainees were enrolled in an observational cohort study in 2015-2016. In 2015, Bicillin was administered to trainees to ameliorate the risk of group A Streptococcus outbreaks, whereas in 2016, trainees did not receive a Bicillin inoculation. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected from participants at days 0, 7, 14, 28, 56, and 90 of training. Swabs were collected, flash frozen, and stored. DNA was extracted from swabs, and amplicon sequencing of the 16s rRNA gene was performed. Microbiome dynamics were evaluated using the QIIME 2 workflow along with DADA2, SINA with SILVA, and an additional processing in R.
resultsWe observed that microbiome samples from the baseline (day 0) visit were distinct from one another, whereas samples collected on day 14 exhibited significant microbiome convergence. Day 14 convergence was coincident with an increase in DNA sequences associated with Streptococcus, though there was not a significant difference between Streptococcus abundance over time between 2015 and 2016 (P = .07), suggesting that Bicillin prophylaxis did not significantly impact overall Streptococcus abundance.
conclusionsThe temporary convergence of microbiomes is coincident with a rise in communicable infections in this population. The dynamic response of microbiomes during initial military training supports similar observations in the literature of transient convergence of the human microbiome under cohabitation in the time frame including in this experiment. This population and the associated longitudinal studies allow for controlled studies of human microbiome under diverse conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.