ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Assembling spatial clustering framework for heterogeneous spatial transcriptomics data with GRAPHDeep.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- NicheDeSig: niche-aware deconvolution and adaptive signature analysis for spatial transcriptomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence Strategies for Mechanistic Cancer Target Discovery and Drug Development: A State-of-the-Art Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Trainable clustering framework for spatial transcriptomics.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSpatial clustering is essential and challenging for spatial transcriptomics' data analysis to unravel tissue microenvironment and biological function. Graph neural networks are promising to address gene expression profiles and spatial location information in spatial transcriptomics to generate latent representations. However, choosing an appropriate graph deep learning module and graph neural network necessitates further exploration and investigation.
resultsIn this article, we present GRAPHDeep to assemble a spatial clustering framework for heterogeneous spatial transcriptomics data. Through integrating 2 graph deep learning modules and 20 graph neural networks, the most appropriate combination is decided for each dataset. The constructed spatial clustering method is compared with state-of-the-art algorithms to demonstrate its effectiveness and superiority. The significant new findings include: (i) the number of genes or proteins of spatial omics data is quite crucial in spatial clustering algorithms; (ii) the variational graph autoencoder is more suitable for spatial clustering tasks than deep graph infomax module; (iii) UniMP, SAGE, SuperGAT, GATv2, GCN, and TAG are the recommended graph neural networks for spatial clustering tasks; and (iv) the used graph neural network in the existent spatial clustering frameworks is not the best candidate. This study could be regarded as desirable guidance for choosing an appropriate graph neural network for spatial clustering. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of GRAPHDeep is available at https://github.com/narutoten520/GRAPHDeep. The studied spatial omics data are available at https://zenodo.org/record/8141084.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.