Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38243604›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 recommendations: Gamma index tolerance and action limits in IMRT and VMAT quality assurance using SunCHECK.

Jia Deng, ShengYan Liu, Yun Huang, Xiuquan Li, Xiangyang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jia DengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xian, Shaanxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9251-6818
ShengYan LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yulin Xingyuan Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Yun HuangDepartment of Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, China.
Xiuquan LiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3778-6996
Xiangyang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Tumor Hospital, Xian, Shaanxi, China.
Shanxi Medical University · CNGuizhou University · CNThe Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNXiyuan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to improve the safety and accuracy of radiotherapy by establishing tolerance (TL) and action (AL) limits for the gamma index in patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using SunCHECK software, as per AAPM TG-218 report recommendations.

methodsThe study included 125 patients divided into six groups by treatment regions (H&N, thoracic and pelvic) and techniques (VMAT, IMRT). SunCHECK was used to calculate the gamma passing rate (%GP) and dose error (%DE) for each patient, for the planning target volume and organs at risk (OARs). The TL and AL were then determined for each group according to TG-218 recommendations. We conducted a comprehensive analysis to compare %DE among different groups and examined the relationship between %GP and %DE.

resultsThe TL and AL of all groups were more stringent than the common standard as defined by the TG218 report. The TL and AL values of the groups differed significantly, and the values for the thoracic groups were lower for both VMAT and IMRT. The %DE of the parameters D

conclusionThe study established TL and AL values tailored to various anatomical regions and treatment techniques at our institution. Establishing PSQA workflows for VMAT and IMRT offers valuable clinical insights and guidance. We also suggest developing a standard combining clinically relevant metrics with %GP to evaluate PSQA results comprehensively.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiation ToleranceRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedGuidelines as TopicHumansSoftwareaction limitsgamma passing rateIMRT QAVMAT QA

Identifiers

PMID38243604
PMCPMC11163510
OpenAlexW4391052809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.